Or that the jabs people take in an internet forum amount to more than a hill of beans. I couldn't disagree more. People are going to make judgements and spew on the internet. It's just noise.
I understand, my mistake. Not a bad translation, but the world I use was not appropriate.
It is hard to find some exact world. I think that the climbing community gave too much place to sport climbing and trad climber must defend there ethic of climbing all the time. talk to some old climber how many jab they received? retro bolting, hanging on the rope, cliff close because there is some objective danger, bad reputation because he climbed in remote area, etc. if you climb 5.12 in sport you are good, but the climber can not be able to do fugue at canon...and if you want to climb false aspiration, that I climbed twice and fugue either, I will not be able to find some one because of the community said that it is not as safe as with bolt.
when I began to climb, I was so happy to find a piton in a route. It took some times before I learned how to protect myself. when I trained safety, I didn't trained for movement and, as anybody who top rope, new climber was able to climb at my level on the crag or with bolt. when we told that a sport climber don't have the knowledge for some dangerous situation...they didn't try to understand, but there is less people in the cliff. planning a route like moby grape to know when to bail, for example, is some think important at this time of the year.
but some people will say that if they had bolt, the climber will not have to learn safety and a classic will become a bolt route. and we will have to fight again to keep trad ethic.
