Author Topic: Climbing Physics Puzzler  (Read 2592 times)

Offline JakeDatc

  • NEClimbs God
  • *****
  • Posts: 704
  • "Don't worry, this won't hurt me a bit"
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #30 on: November 07, 2013, 12:17:29 PM »
If a strand gets cut then the whole thing fails.   clove hitch keeps it a closed system. 

this is the link the RC.com thread  but all of the inline pictures got messed up when RC did away with them so the thread is kinda stupid now.

http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_view_flat;post=1306133;page=1;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;mh=25;
« Last Edit: November 07, 2013, 12:23:24 PM by JakeDatc »
"I really don't know who act like if he have the true." -Champoing

DLottmann

  • Guest
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #31 on: November 07, 2013, 12:26:53 PM »
I must not be picturing this correctly then. If you clip the sling to both bolts and make your magic ask how does one Clovehitch at one of the bolts make it redundant?

Offline JakeDatc

  • NEClimbs God
  • *****
  • Posts: 704
  • "Don't worry, this won't hurt me a bit"
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #32 on: November 07, 2013, 12:51:41 PM »
Maybe i remembered the setup wrong.   the whole thing hurt my brain so i went back to my usual stuff..   maybe it only works if the piece blows out not the sling gets cut. 
"I really don't know who act like if he have the true." -Champoing

Offline lucky luke

  • NEClimbs God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1566
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #33 on: November 07, 2013, 02:09:16 PM »
The interminable effing discussions of whether this piece is good to 9kN while that was good to 10kN so it's better, blah, blah, blah.

I am surprise that they don't talked about the use of a gri gri on the belay!!!.

Offline frik

  • NEClimbs God
  • *****
  • Posts: 538
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #34 on: November 07, 2013, 03:26:25 PM »
For this to be a real physics "problem", you have to add a caveat like...
Assume the relationship of cord stretch to cord length is linear.

Offline DGoguen

  • NEClimbs Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #35 on: November 07, 2013, 03:34:05 PM »
Hey Luke
I think you are misquoting people above, unless Steve had a stroke.
Don't Climb

Offline Bill

  • NEClimbs Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
  • It's All Good, Just Climb!
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #36 on: November 07, 2013, 09:15:50 PM »
Dave say it ain't true!

Jake had a brain cramp and Steve experienced a stroke.  I'm so damn confused!!!  I hope everyone recovers completely and quickly!  BTW are you doing any climbing these days Hikin' Jake?


Offline JakeDatc

  • NEClimbs God
  • *****
  • Posts: 704
  • "Don't worry, this won't hurt me a bit"
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #37 on: November 07, 2013, 11:25:19 PM »
Not much Bill..  biking more..  should get to 3k miles this year :)    going back to school so time for going places is hard so biking is easier
"I really don't know who act like if he have the true." -Champoing

Offline triguy

  • NEClimbs Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 114
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #38 on: November 08, 2013, 08:00:50 AM »
Question: what is of bigger concern in a leader fall directly onto the belay - protection failure or sling/cordalette failure?
Ice has two purposes in life: climbing and watering down bad scotch!

Offline Admin Al

  • NEClimbs Administrator
  • NEClimbs God
  • *****
  • Posts: 7182
  • Climb 'till your forearms turn to jelly!
    • NEClimbs
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #39 on: November 08, 2013, 09:12:59 AM »
good discussion... FWIW I have a pre-made-up equalette that I use a lot. between that and a cordelette I feel pretty well covered.
Al Hospers
____________________________________
my music
 https://www.facebook.com/BlackMountainRamblers

web hosting, design and software programming:
 http://www.cambersoft.com

Offline strandman

  • NEClimbs God
  • *****
  • Posts: 4713
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #40 on: November 08, 2013, 10:48:16 AM »
Question: what is of bigger concern in a leader fall directly onto the belay - protection failure or sling/cordalette failure?
Belayer failure

Offline sneoh

  • NEClimbs God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #41 on: November 08, 2013, 11:25:18 AM »
Question: what is of bigger concern in a leader fall directly onto the belay - protection failure or sling/cordalette failure?
Belayer failure
I agree with John.  Can get real nasty in a hurry.

"You have to decide to do a flag, where you can broke your vertebrae or a barn door depending of your pro" - the poster formerly known as Champ

Offline triguy

  • NEClimbs Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 114
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #42 on: November 08, 2013, 11:48:09 AM »
Assuming the belayer can arrest the fall......my question still stands.
Ice has two purposes in life: climbing and watering down bad scotch!

Offline strandman

  • NEClimbs God
  • *****
  • Posts: 4713
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #43 on: November 08, 2013, 12:10:24 PM »
Since I don't use a cordalette, I would feel a bit more concerned about the gear..esp the top piece. Always belay through something helps as well..the top piece of gear, first one on the next pitch,etc  always. 

I can't imagine a 7mm cord in good shape failing however

DLottmann

  • Guest
Re: Climbing Physics Puzzler
« Reply #44 on: November 08, 2013, 12:33:48 PM »
Question: what is of bigger concern in a leader fall directly onto the belay - protection failure or sling/cordalette failure?

C. Scrambled Organs.

Seriously, a true factor 2 will break the climber's body. You'd almost wish the gear and cord failed.