NEClimbs.com forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Reading the forum on your cell phone? There's an easier way. We've enabled a Tapatalk app that makes browsing the forum a whole lot easier. Check it out in the iPhone or Android store if you don't own it already.

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Rope Bearing  (Read 106 times)

cklein

  • NEClimbs Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 78
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Rope Bearing
« on: August 17, 2004, 09:46:46 AM »

Can somebody explain to me the concept of the rope bearing radius on carabiners.  How it relates to safety and climbing efficiency?
Logged

LTIAC

  • NEClimbs Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Re: Rope Bearing
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2004, 07:38:47 AM »

I'll give this a shot.  The rope bearing radius would be an indication of how much rope makes contact with the biner when you load the rope.  With a larger radius you would distribute the force over a greater area and the cross-section of the rope would not flatten as much.  Both of these conditions would be favorable to the rope as compared to a shorter radius.  Note how UIAA testing uses a specific diameter bar when testing ropes.  A thinner bar would probably result in a rope rated for fewer falls.  

Logged

DWarriner

  • NEClimbs God
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 506
  • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Re: Rope Bearing
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2004, 08:01:08 AM »

This is a little over-simplified, but makes the main points.


The 2 types of forces that are important for this type of rope failure are compression (pushing) and tensile (pulling).

When you bend something, the inside radius is squeezed, the outside radius is pulled. テつ The classic example of this is to bend a deck of cards. テつ If you look at the cards on the inside of the bend they seem to stick out in relation to the other cards. テつ Conversely, the top cards are "shorter." テつ Now imagine the cards are glued together and cannot move in relation to each other. テつ If you are successful in bending the deck, the cards on the inside of the center are being squeezed. テつ The farther out you go from the center of the deck (neutral), the higher the "squeezing force." テつ There is a similar set of "pulling" forces on the outside of the deck. テつ The tighter the bend, the higher the forces.

Thus when considering making equipment for climbing, and you are looking at the forces on a rope during a fall they include:

1) Force applied to the system (force of the fall)
2) Characteristics of what is being bent (rope)
3) Radius of the curve that the rope wraps around during a fall(Rope Bearing Radius)

When you're making carabiners, the only one of these you have control over is the rope bearing radius and thus you want to make that as big as possible - thus reducing stress on the rope. テつ Unfortunately, big clunky carabiners, don't sell, so you want the carabiners to be as small and light as possible. テつ 

You now have conflicting design requirements and need to decide what direction you want to go in (safer vs lighter).

One other interesting note is that tensile and compressive forces tend to cancel each other out. テつ When you pull on a rope (no bends) all forces are tensile (pretty intuitive). テつ 

Thus, during a fall, the highest forces on a rope going over a carabiner are on the outside of the rope. テつ They are being doubly pulled because 1) they are pulled by virtue of being on the outside of the bend and, 2) being pulled because the rope is being stretched by the fall.

The compressive forces on the inside of the bend are actually relieved to some extent by the fall.


This issues comes up time and time again in all aspects of mechanical design. テつ Here are some pictures from the same issues for kayaks:

http://www.oneoceankayaks.com/Sandcore.htm

All of this, of course, depends on the rope actually coming in contact with the rope bearing radius of the carabiner during a fall - which is not a sure bet. テつ But that's a different topic.

-David



« Last Edit: August 27, 2004, 12:37:36 PM by DWarriner »
Logged
There are no stupid questions - only stupid answers.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.134 seconds with 22 queries.